| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fire-Proofing Your Network With UTM,
What's going on? Without UTM, you might be forced to sift through several independent event logs, trying to correlate traffic that slipped through your firewall with alerts reported by your IDS and worms detected on servers. With UTM, you can review firewall and IPS and anti-X alerts by looking in just one place. Here again, the degree of unification varies. UTM events are time-stamped by the same clock and written to the same local log (or sent to the same mailbox or SYSLOG server). But many UTM products incorporate third-party anti-X engines, such as Sophos anti-virus, Symantec anti-spam, or WebSense URL filters. Even when third-party engines are bolted into the same UTM appliance and GUI, they can still trigger independent events. For example, all alerts generated by each MX1004 service are written to the same log and share the same overall structure, but they differ in detaileven hot-linking to different websites. It is not always easy to tell when multiple alerts were caused by the same incident, but scrolling through all events in time-sequence can be a big help (Figure 2-6). On the other hand, event configuration is disjointdetailed alert and summary settings must be established independently for each service (Figure 2-7). Coming up next
End
< Back to Part 2, page 1
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||