| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MSSP Survey Part 3, Page 3:
Managed Remote Access VPN Services As shown in this graph, SSL made a much bigger showing in this year's survey. Of the RA VPN providers participating in our survey, all but two offer an IPsec-based RA VPN service. But 67 percentdouble our 2003 turnoutnow offer SSL-based RA VPNs. Nine offer both SSL and IPsec-based RA services. Five offer IPsec but not SSL, and two offer SSL but not IPsec. Clearly, SSL hasn't (yet) replaced IPsec. But Infonetics projects that growth in MPLS and SSL will cause IPsec VPN service revenue to drop from 84 percent in 2003 to 62 percent by 2008. Why this shift towards SSL? On the client side, SSL VPNs leverage standard-issue browsers instead of requiring installed IPsec VPN Client software. When client software is needed, it may be delivered as a Java applet (lightweight client) or an auto-downloaded/temporary Win32 program. Many companies have been drawn to this "clientless" model to reduce IT costs associated with remote desktop support. However, for managed RA VPN services, the "clientless" cost equation isn't clear-cut. Many of the MSSPs participating in our survey supply pre-configured, web-downloadable IPsec VPN Clients to their customers. Responsibility for client installation may fall to individual end users or the customer's IT department. Moreover, on-going client configuration and updates are often performed by the MSSP as part of the offering. Help desk services may also be provided, either as part of the RA VPN service, or as an added-cost option. In short, because your MSSP will be shouldering some of the work, don't assume that your in-house IT cost will be higher with IPsec than with SSL. We recommend carefully evaluating specific RA VPN offerings to understand who will be responsible for which tasks. Also consider tradeoffs that lie beyond the scope of this survey, like network vs. application independence, and enabling access from public PCs vs. ensuring endpoint security. Ultimately, RA VPNs are about providing secure access. The services described in this year's survey have made positive strides on both accounts:
On the other hand, older/weaker PPTP and its replacement L2TP are still widely supported by participating providers. We attribute this to platform support: these protocols are present in major RA VPN concentrators and Microsoft PCs, whether customers use them or not. In our next survey, we may ask providers how often these layer 2 tunneling protocols are actually enabled in customer VPN policies. As in 2003, Nortel Contivity, Cisco 3000/PIX, and CheckPoint are still popular for IPsec RA; Aventail and Netscreen (now Juniper, formerly Neoteris) appear to be most popular for SSL RA. Provider-specific security appliances from SecurePipe, PresiNET, ISS, and ClearPath also appear in this year's list. All but one are CPE-based services, although some MSSPs will optionally host a customer's RA VPN appliance at their POP. Policy update procedures and log/report access responses were often identical for S2S and RA VPNs. Some differences can be attributed to platform management and monitoring capabilities. For example, Aventail's SSL VPN service (sold by both MCI and Aventail) delivers user trend reporting; Fiberlink offers departmental chargeback/cost accounting reports. Other differences accommodate ongoing user provisioning required by RA VPNsfor example, MCI's Access Manager. Companies with large workforces should pay special attention to features that let them quickly add/delete users and access data needed for accounting and trouble-shooting. Finally, take a good look at RA VPN add-ons. Options offered by participating providers include network access, managed authentication services, help desk services, managed personal firewalls, and endpoint security checking. Keep in mind that VPNs are just one component of desktop security; as remote access expands to potentially-hostile environments like public PCs, hotspots, and hotel broadband, it is increasingly important to make sure that "remote endpoints" connected to VPNs are not compromised. Stay tuned for next week, when we'll take a look at several complementary managed security services: anti-virus, anti-spam, and content filtering.
< Back to page one < Back to page two: Managed Site to Site VPN Services
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||