|

ISPs In Western Europe -
second edition - part 3
The Business Sector:
The Emergence of the ASP Model
Internet penetration in the business sector is ahead of that in the residential
sector in most Western European markets.
Rising demand for a fuller range of services as businesses seek the
benefits of transferring more of their systems over to IP networks provides
many more diverse opportunities for access providers than does the residential
sector, enabling them to combine their basic connectivity offerings with
potentially higher-margin services such as Web hosting and design, ecommerce
solutions and systems integration.
There is also the potential to engage in finer market segmentation than
in the residential sector. For the past few years, ISPs have tended to
market their services to the business sector on a largely undifferentiated
basis, but increasing competition is leading many of them to refocus their
operations on particular horizontal or vertical market segments.
The emergence of the application service provider (ASP) model over the
past two years in particular has provided a major new opening for ISPs
keen to exploit opportunities in the business market.
There are clear reasons for ISPs to seek to move into the area of application
services provision. These include:
| Diversification
of revenue streams |
ISPs are facing widespread erosion of profit margins
on their core services as growing competition forces down prices.
The provision of IP access, wholesale transit and basic hosting services
is becoming unprofitable for all but those with large economies of
scale.. The ASP model gives ISPs a way of augmenting their revenue
streams by offering services with potentially higher margins. |
| Service differentiation
and the reduction of churn |
ASP services have the potential to become a key means
by which ISPs can achieve service differentiation and increase customer
loyalty. Because of the breadth of possible ecommerce services and
the technical complexity involved in developing and implementing them,
there are opportunities to engage in technical innovation and market
segmentation, and to offer solutions tailored to the needs of particular
businesses. This should enable smaller ISPs, for example, by servicing
local or sector-specific market segments, to forge a position in the
telecoms market without having to compete with the larger providers
head on. By offering more varied and complex services, ISPs can raise
switching barriers for their clients, increasing the inconvenience
and expense associated with moving to another service provider. The
risk of churn is greatly reduced as the service provided by the ISP
becomes more personalised to the customer, and as the service provider
takes on the role of business partner and trusted third party, thereby
increasing customer dependency. |
| Increased network
utility |
ISPs that become involved in the development and provision
of ecommerce applications will also indirectly benefit by creating
greater demand for their core services of connectivity, hosting and
transport. The growth of the ASP market will significantly increase
the number of businesses online, the amount of time that they spend
online and their demand for higher-bandwidth connectivity. At the
same time, in the process of centralising storage and processing power
through hosting applications, ISPs will be drawing substantial content
and computing power back into the network, making it more 'intelligent',
and lessening commoditisation of their traditional business. In order
to take advantage of this, ISPs' service portfolios should aim to
integrate the network closely with their other service elements in
order to leverage it from the top of the value chain. |
Developing Competitive Advantage
The key to earnings growth for an ISP looking to become an ASP will lie
in its ability to balance the achievement of economies of scale, by building
a large base of customers and cross-selling further applications into
this installed customer base, with maintaining a considerable degree of
service differentiation in order to engage customers at as high a level
as possible.
Two basic options in the deployment of services will be to adopt either
a horizontal or vertical focus.
| Horizontal focus |
Companies that adopt a horizontal focus will be doing
so with the aim of scaling-up operations as fast as they can, seeking
to gain critical mass quickly through the deployment of standard packages
on as broad a basis as possible. Companies adopting this approach
will need to start with the deployment of less complex applications
and work towards offering more complex solutions incrementally. This
will give the ASP a potentially very sizeable market with users ranging
from large enterprises to all types of SME. This approach will limit
the ASP's ability to deploy new, more sophisticated services quickly;
in addition, it will make it harder to maintain customer loyalty,
in the initial stages at least, where the customer's growth needs
may outstrip the operator's ability to develop more complex offerings.
As a long-term strategy, this option is likely to be attractive only
to large IP backbone players, such as Cable & Wireless and Qwest,
that are confident of their ability to compete on the basis of achieving
massive economies of scale. |
| Vertical focus |
Companies seeking a more differentiated vertical approach will need
to begin by focusing upon particular industry sectors, such as the
travel industry, on business activities such as ERP, or on local or
regional markets. The aim would be to acquire in-depth knowledge of
customer requirements, and to accelerate service deployment times.
This would enable a company to differentiate its services early, offering
more complex solutions through focusing its resources, and building
a defensible position against future potential competition. Those
that are successful in developing complex offerings should be able
to forge profitable positions on the basis of strong service differentiation.
Key vertical markets for an ASP operation to pursue within this area
include travel, transport and logistics, manufacturing and distribution,
financial services, specialist high-tech, entertainment, information
and education, communications and health. Whichever approach they
select, ISPs must consider their application service portfolio as
an evolving entity. The ultimate objective should be that of developing
the necessary organisational skills and knowledge of customer requirements,
in order to continuously deepen their overall market penetration.
|
Partnerships are already a key part of the drive to build market share.
These are being established in response to the need to engage in risk
sharing, to seed the market, to secure routes to market for the new services,
to build trust with the end user, and, most importantly, to assemble new
skill sets. Within the ASP market, offering complete solutions to customers
will require skills that are naturally owned by a variety of players,
and so a vital element of the race will be the swift assembly of the requisite
competencies.
The key to reaping the full benefit of the ASP model will be to retain
control of the customer relationship and to avoid being demoted to the
status of anonymous third-party wholesale network provider.
At present, ISPs are in a strong position to maintain ownership of the
customer and be the dominant members within a partnership: their networks
form a critical part of the overall delivery chain, and they have good
access to potential customers via their existing customer databases. In
the long term, however, these assets alone will not be enough. ISPs will
need to ensure that their networks are capable of providing the kind of
reliability, availability, redundancy, security and uptimes companies
will expect if they are to place their business applications in the hands
of a third party.
|
|