|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
"Chris Witteman, a staff attorney for the PUC who also represents the Division of Ratepayer Advocates, confirmed that staffers recently reviewed AT&T's service agreement and that some believe regulatory action is needed to protect consumers. "We want AT&T to be required to revisit and reformulate the agreement so it doesn't violate the law," he said. ... Two years ago, regulators voted to give phone companies more freedom in pricing and marketing decisionsthus opening the door to AT&T's new agreement. The rationale was that this would create a more competitive marketplace, which would benefit consumers. However, the Division of Ratepayer Advocates concluded in a recent report that "significant rate increases" have occurred since the market was deregulated. Witteman said a key problem with AT&T's service agreement is that the company doesn't list all the terms and conditions that apply to customers. Rather, AT&T says customers must review a separate "guidebook." That guidebook is available only online, Witteman said, and runs about 2,500 pages. "What consumer is going to slog through that?" he asked. " LA Times article AT & T buries customer rights in 2,500-page 'guidebook' |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||