| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ISPCON Keynote: Three Hosts, Three Strategies The ISPCON webhosting keynote brought together some key players in the industry, each of whom described a different core strategy.
The ISPCON Uberhost keynote panel presented three key players and one key observer. Paul Stapleton of The I$P Ho$ting Report is a key industry observer and investment banker. Stapleton had a solo session earlier in the conference which we will write about next week on ISP-Planet. He moderated the session. The other three participants each represented s different path to growth using a different skill set. The developer It has made acquisitions, Adelman said, but only to acquire technology skills that it did not already have. It does not buy customers. The marketer Asked how the company can price at below cost, and why, Marsh replied, "we bet that prices were going down. We turned profitable in 18 months, selling dedicated servers at $99 when others were selling it at $1,000. Sun Microsystems had just bought Cobalt, and we were able to buy a truckload of product with no payments due for nine months." Nowadays, the company's ARPU is closer to $125, because customers have been sold additional services. Of course, success brings costs too. "The local power utility told us one year that if we increased power usage by one amp, they'd shut us down. We focused on other products for that year." The financier Adelman, of GoDaddy, objected to the growth by acquisition strategy, saying that it can change the culture of a company. Teolis said that Peer1 believes in delegating responsibility. He added that his company is learning skills from the companies it has acquired. Marsh said that EV1 buys when time to market is a key consideration, but if the prices are too high, building is also a good option. Teolis said that at current data center prices, it's almost never necessary to build a data center because data centers are cheap to buy. He said the company buys companies that need bandwidth, and hooks them up to its infrastructure. The conclusion End
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||