|

Research
Research Suggests All Is Not Bleak
The broadband fixed wireless industry has supposedly been
in the doldrums for a year or more. Vendors are bleeding red ink and singing
the blues. More than a few have dropped out.
Apparently whatever ails the industry overall isn't having much effect
on the ISP market segment. Or not according to surprising new research
from ISP-Market
LLC, a Walnut Creek, California-based consulting and research firm.
For ISP-Market's most recent study, Broadband Wireless Access 2002:
Service Provider Profiles, Market Drivers and Spending Projections,
the firm surveyed 120 ISPs already offering broadband fixed wireless services.
The report projects ISPs will spend $345 million on fixed wireless network
equipment in 2002.
Over 50 percent of the respondents indicated they planned to deploy
from ten to 30 additional access points in the first half of the year
alone. Given that most survey participants are Tier 2 and 3 players and
many only have a few access points now, this is significant.
And it's not just existing wireless ISPs who are spending money on wireless.
For another study last October, ISP to xSP: Putting the Service in
Service Provider, the firm interviewed 120 randomly selected U.S.
ISPs about their plans for offering additional services. Thirty percent
said they would launch broadband fixed wireless access initiatives in
2002.
Again, this is a significant increase. ISP-Market estimates that less
than 10 percent of ISPs600 to 700 all toldhad deployed fixed wireless
services by the end of 2001. Managing partner Tom McCafferty admits the
firm's estimates tend to be conservative. Others have suggested there
may be as many as 1,200 wireless ISPs in the U.S., he says.
Near-term key findings
The firm also quite deliberately did not ask participants about plans
for 2003 or beyond. "We don't want to be the kind of company that says,
'This market will be worth $8 billion by 2005,'" McCafferty says. "We've
got access to same group. We'll work with them again later this year."
So why, despite a general economic slowdown and supposedly reduced confidence
in the fixed wireless industry should 2002 be the year of the wireless
ISP? McCafferty says it's a combination of factors.
One is that with the disappearance of many competitive local exchange
carriers (CLECs), it became more difficult for ISPs to find other ways
to provide broadband access.
"There was a major decline in Tier 2 and 3 ISPs' access to DSL," McCafferty
says. That was enough to make many of them start looking at fixed wireless.
"And then the fact that they don't have to deal with the telcos [if they
go with a fixed wireless solution] makes it even sweeter."
The other big factor was equipment availability. "Price-wise it's
there now, the stability is there. There are just not as many question
marks on the equipment as there were," McCafferty says.
"Now they can deliver some kind of broadband solution and the ROI
is half the time it would be if they went with DSL from the telco. And
for the first time they're not having to share revenues with anyone."
Another factor may simply be that the new entrants saw others having
success with fixed wireless and jumped on the bandwagon. McCafferty did
not actually ask participants in the later wireless ISP survey if they
were making money on fixed wireless services, but they must be, he reasons.
"Looking at what some of their expansion plans are, I would certainly
hope that they're making money," McCafferty says. "Of course that may
not be a good assumption given the track record of this industry."
He's only half joking. Most analysts believe companies like Winstar
and Teligent failed largely because of their now discredited build-it-and-they-will-come
network expansion strategies.
Buildup to buildouts
Even more impressive than the aggressive expansion plans revealed by many
wireless ISPs is the way they intend to fund their buildouts, McCafferty
says. Almost 40 percent said they would do it with cash reserves or from
revenues.
"We found that fascinating," he says. "It says a lot about the ISP
space todayjust the fact, first of all, that so many have the cash
to do this."
In the early days of the ISP industry, he notes, most companies were
so cash poor they relied heavily on vendor financing. But virtually none
of the wireless ISP respondents to the ISP-Market survey said they would
fund their fixed wireless expansions with vendor assistance. The rest
planned to borrow from the bank or seek equity financing. Broadband
Wireless Access 2002 should be of interest both to ISPs thinking of entering
the wireless ISP arena and network equipment vendors, McCafferty says.
Major sections of the report look at: sources of venture and investment
capital, key factors and challenges for wireless ISPs, current service
plans, existing customer bases, projected one year growth and competing
broadband services and price points.
Who are wireless ISPs serving with their broadband fixed wireless offerings?
No big surprises there. The report says 58 percent are primarily targeting
small to medium-size businesses (SMBs), 17 percent are going after large
enterprises, 12 percent are targeting the small office, home office (SOHO)
marketand the rest (13 percent) are going after residential customers.
Most are offering more bandwidth than digital subscriber line (DSL) and
cable competitors, but also charging slightly more for it. The most popular
service offering is 512 Kbps, with 1.5 Mbps the next most common. Some
wireless ISPs still provide 256 Kbps service, but few now offer 128 Kpbs.
Trying elements
The biggest challenge wireless ISPs said they faced was designing and
implementing broadband fixed wireless networks that worked. No big surprise
there either.
"Just understanding radios and wirelessit's a whole new game for them,"
he says. "It goes well beyond TCP and routing about which everyone thinks
they're expert. It's a whole new piece of technology for them to learn."
McCafferty is coy about revealing the other top five challenges. But
getting vendor supportmentioned by only 12 percentwas not a major
factor, he says, implying that vendors are providing fairly decent service.
That may come as a surprise to some wireless ISPs operators.
End
|