| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Servers: Can Prices Get Any Lower? Manufacturers across the board are slashing prices even in the low-end servers-systems category. Does the slowing economy offer your ISP business any year-end holiday bargains?
Following its lead in the mid-range server market, Dell Computer Corp. has made yet another aggressive stride to capture yet another market of significance: the market for low-end value-oriented server-systems, which is made up of servers priced $1,500 or less. Manufacturers across the board have made clear efforts to push into this segment, but the early leaders in this race appear to be IBM Corp. and Dell, which have gotten into the lead by undercutting the rest of the competition. Of the top two leaders, Dell appears to have a clear advantage due significantly to price/performance superiority. The low-end servers-systems category has drawn considerable attention due to two key reasonsone being the slowing economy and the second being the desire to stimulate growth in the small-to-medium-size-business (SMB) market. As the economy has slumped and server sales of all types have slowed in general, this low-end segment continues to be a hot-spot growth area. The idea of offering the most bang for the buck has created a price war among manufacturers resulting in systems sometimes under-pricing desktop computers. In some cases, with promotions taken into consideration, low-end value servers, such as the Dell PowerEdge 500SC, have hit price levels as low as $529 USD. True value In addition to Dell and IBM, several other manufacturers, including Compaq Computer Corp., Hewlett-Packard, Inc., and Gateway, Inc. have introduced servers playing in this market niche. However, of the systems available, Dell has made the most aggressive strides, continuing to offer the most bang for the buck.
Dell also recently announced a revision to its already existing PowerEdge 1500SC system, which now offers higher-end features such as hot swap capabilities, redundant power supplies, dual processor capabilities with either P3/1.13GHz or P3/1.26GHz CPUs, all for a base starting price of $1,099.
With prices reaching all time lows, many people wonder what the manufacturers hope to gain by offering such low-priced systems. Although margins are slimmer on these types of systems compared to mid-range systems, manufacturers have two key objectives. First, manufacturers are attempting to gain market share and sell volume. Second is the anticipation of making profits from supplemental service, such as warranties, consulting, systems integration, etc. A third factor coming into play is the downward pressure on the economy. Many manufacturers have reported slowing sales of pricier mid-range systems compared to low-end systems, which have tended to be relatively stable. Low-end systems have come down in price so much that the prices continue to be attractive and affordable solutions for budget-conscious small businesses. In the near future, a continued battle in this low-priced segment will likely become even more heated. As for now, in terms of price to performance, Dell continues to lead the pack with IBM trailing slightly behind. For the past several months, Dell has continued to promote its value "SC" line with rebates ranging from $100 to $200. In combination with its already low prices, Dell's systems clearly give the most bang for the buck right now. Like Dell, IBM has continued to show a strong will to cut prices and compete head on with Dell. IBM's systems across the board have continued to fall in price, making the gap between market-leader Dell, smaller and smaller. Whether IBM can continue waging this brutal price/performance battle with Dell is a question which only time can answer.
End Based in La Jolla, California, ARS, Inc. provides business-to-business Competitive Market Intelligence. ARS specializes in the daily tracking and analyzing of the e-commerce, PC, and Networking markets. ARS is a comprehensive resource for competitive market intelligence about you company's products, pricing, margins, marketing activities, promotional campaigns, and channel programs.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||