From a Dutch ISP came a request for some observations on successful U.S.
DSL companies. "I want to compare my local market observations with the best
players in on the U.S. DSL market." Unfortunately, almost no one is making
a go of competing with the Bells. Covad just reported a $20 million loss,
and all the other remaining companies (Broadview, Network Telecom, etc.) are
in pain. So the U.S. has no real models of success for you. Perhaps Bulldog
in the U.K. or QSC and Hansenet in Germany might be more to the point. It
really is that bad and I wish it weren't so. Yahoo BB and eAccess in Japan,
plus FastWeb and the other emerging Europeans, prove there's no reason a dedicated
regulator couldn't have developed competition, but holding back and praying
for the market isn't enough.
Briefs
Indian national carrier BSNL ordered another 75,000 ports of DSLAMs from
UTStarcom.Occam has quietly built a stronger position in the U.S. small carrier
market, resulting in a surprising $6.5 million in sales Q4. Zhone also is
finding traction in that market, with quarterly results that drove the stock
up 40 percent according to Forbes.
Press
A tip of the hat to the online reporters doing a strong job identifying
"sock puppets" and "coin-operated think tanks." Carol Wilson, back at Telephony,
editorializes about the lobbying to stop muni broadband says, "Incumbents
should be aggressively seeking means of working with municipal leaders to
guarantee greater access to broadband resources for a wider swath of the U.S."
Right onthe best way to stop government jumping into services is to
do a darned good job yourself. (I've been quoting Telephony heavily lately,
and I think that reflects an important change in the magazine. Despite enormous
pressure because of reduced staff, the reporters, especially online, are responding
with imaginative work. Someone in charge is doing things right.)
Ken Belson at the New York Times is Jennie's neighbor, so I'm glad for
another opportunity to write something friendly. One key test of a good journalist
is the quality of his sources; we've all read too many articles that add little
to an official release beyond obvious comments from predictable people. How
many D.C. stories have you read with an "official," a bell spokesperson, and
one of the same three consumer advocates, for example. Belson is doing much
better, finding Bryan Moir, a true insider, for the Phone Mergers May Curb
Price Wars story. Software Service Aims to Outfox Caller ID a while
back had comments from Lee Tien of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, who's
always thoughtful and articulate; Loretta Lynch of the California PUC, one
of the most effective consumer advocates; Mark Rotenberg of the Electronic
Privacy Information Center, a key expert; and Bob Atkinson, of Columbia University
for some perspective ("it's spy versus spy"). Belson opened the article with
color (how a bill collector might use the service, idea from a woman bounty
hunter) and covered the legal and practical issues from solid sources. In
a favorite Times touch, he had a revealing quote for last "Every technology
has a dark side," Mr. Jepson said, "but our customer will have to use it legally."
The Wall Street Journal has almost a dozen strong reporters on related
beats, making it impossible for the smaller staff at the Times to match them
story for story. But Belson is making the Times telecom reporting a must read
as well.
Wall Street
Level 3 jumped 17 percent in one day, but not because of my note that morning
the AOL deal might drive up the price. Jim Crowe, who's keynoting VON, put
the company up for sale clearly hoping to draw an AT&T or MCI type bid. The
numbers make the deal hard, however. Level 3 is carrying high debt and little
spare cash. MCI had enough cash to cover their debt, allowing Verizon to use
MCI's own money for much of the takeover bid. It has to be a tough concession
by Crowe, who's survived the crash and attracted support recently from Warren
Buffet and Legg Mason. But he's continuing to lose hundreds of millions of
dollars, while any honest analysis has to see SBC/AT&T and Verizon/MCI becoming
even tougher to fight against.
Similarly, Qwest's primary hope is that the states will allow them to milk
the remnants of monopoly enough to reduce debt and build new businesses. They
remain in a race against insolvency, which has been postponed by selling the
Yellow Page assets for the cash to stay afloat. Tough call for regulators
as Qwest, calmer but still desperate, seeks huge rate hikes despite declining
costs of actual providing the service. Should local phone rates go up to pay
off a failed gamble in national networks and overpaying in the boom times?
Local telcos survived a scare about cuts in USF at the last FCC meeting,
but the writing is on the wall in D.C. change is coming. Carriers with debt
above $2,000/customer have to be considered enormously risky, which is why
Citizens has the highest dividend rate on the stock exchange.
CAN-TV Venezuela was downgraded by Merrill, because their earnings aren't
enough to support the dividend. They face major political risk; with the U.S.
government actively trying to overthrow Chavez, he's got no reason to let
a Verizon dominated company raise rates and profits. Merrill was dubious about
CAN-TV's response of raising capital spending 50 percent instead of paying
out the maximum in cash. Another view is that CAN-TV, investing in the growth
of Venezuela, is making the only play it can for respectability and survival.
Milking the country for a dividend is not a recipe for political support.