From a reporter in Philadelphia: "I'll be more than happy to tell Comcast
they can keep their exorbitant, high-priced service and go over to DSL. Presuming,
of course, Verizon ever gets its act together and moves into my suburb." Hear
that Verizon? Finish the build.
From Australia comes a request for more details on my report that Japanese
competition is built on inexpensive unbundled fiber. "We're now trying to
rollout DSLAMs about half a million people, but backhaul costs are our largest
single cost and severely limit us. There is currently an Australian government
inquiry into broadband competition and I would like to give them some accurate
information." Can readers help me with particulars on how Japan and elsewhere
keep fiber costs low enough to allow more than
one carrier to serve? Ireland and Michigan are working on solving that problem,
subsidizing competitive fiber builds.
Briefs
Randall Stephenson, SBC CFO, two weeks ago
pointed out that cost drops are large enough to allow price cuts. "Costs are
dropping so rapidly that we are maintaining margins despite cutting our prices."
Previously he's said that where they have good DSL volumes, like California,
the margins on DSL are very good, similar to telephony around 40 percent.
SBC is down to $26.95 for a twelve month contract, a step BellSouth has not
followed. A key question is whether a monopoly would maximize profits at high
prices, or whether lowering prices broadens the market enough to more than
compensate. Andrew Odlyzko and I both guess the low prices are more profitable
in the long run, but that's a tough one to be sure about. Smart people, including
BellSouth, disagree.
"Cable broadband providers lose on average 2 percent of their customers
every month, a hefty loss," Richard Wolniewicz writes in Billing World. North
American telcos wish they had figures that low. They run so hard when I ask
that question I suspect churn must be disastrously high.
"High-definition digital television is beginning
to take off in the United States," Markoff claims in the NY Times, as he reports
Intel's chips will drive costs down dramatically. Is your network of 2005
and 2007 ready, or would you rather lose your most profitable customers?
Brava to SBC for being one of only a handful
of major companies with a board that's a quarter female.
Also happy to hear that Verizon is "committed
to deploy broadband service throughout our Pennsylvania service territory."
Amir Leshem, previously at Metalink, joins
the faculty at the new School of Engineering of Bar-Ilan University. Research
will include signal processing, communications, and optics.
For job ads and the DSL Prime event code, see the DSL
Prime website.
Wall Street
Anton Wahlman at Needham has written an extraordinary
analysis of why a smart provider will make more money on the Internet connectivity
than on high-priced proprietary content. I'll be excerpting it in a future
issue, but meanwhile he's allowed me to forward a copy if you ask.
CEOs will be in New York next week for the Needham
conference: Covad's Charlie Hoffman, Carrier Access's Roger Koenig, MIPS'
John Bourgoin, Netopia's Alan Lefkof, Terayon's Zaki Rakib, Transmeta's Matthew
R. Perry (without a penguin), Tut Systems' Salvatore D'Auria, Zhone's Mory
Ejabat, ARRIS's Robert Stanzione and many others. Probably not too late for
investors to check with Vik Grover for admission.
Cody Willard of thestreet.com made AFC his
top pick, pointing to the upside of their FTTH win at Verizon. Confirms that
it was right to go after that contract at virtually any cost, because the
stock price benefit will outweigh any short term losses on the bid. The rumored
$300 is probably more than the first generation of gear is costing, but that
will come down rapidly.
Copyright 2004 Dave Burstein.
The DSL Prime Newsletter is reprinted with permission.
"The power of the printing press belongs solely to those who own the presses"
A.J. Leibling
The Internet is the cheapest printing press ever invented.